“科学学”视角下的科研工作者行为研究(5)

3 结束语

基于大数据的在线用户行为分析已经成为一个热点研究问题，梳理其发展的脉络，不难发现其中的一些特点。首先用户行为具有复杂性，需要理论和实证的研究；其次是大量用户各类行为被记录和保存，使得数据驱动的研究工作得以开展；最后是用户行为在推荐、信息传播、安全等各领域均有实际的应用。对照基于学术大数据的科研工作者行为研究，不难发现类似的因素：科学的复杂性、学术大数据的可用性、对科学规律认识的需求分别对应了在线用户行为分析领域的驱动力量。当前国际上科学学研究的兴起也充分说明了这是一个大有可为的领域。相关的研究问题很多，本文只是列举了一部分，其余部分可由读者进一步发掘探索。

[1] KUHNTS. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

[2] DESOLLAPDJ. Little science, big science and beyond[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1986.

[3] SINATRAR, WANGD, DEVILLEP, et the evolution of individual scientific impact[J]. Science, 2016,354(6312): 5239.

[4] DASILVAJAT. Does China need to rethink its metrics-and citationbased research rewards policies [J].Scientometrics, 2017, 112(3): 1853-1857.

[5] AZOULAYP, GRAFF-ZIVINJ, UZZIB,et al. Toward a more scientific science[J].Science, 2018, 361(6408): 1194-1197.

[6] JONESBF, WUCHTYS, UZZIB. Multiuniversity research teams: shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science[J]. Science, 2008, 322(5905):1259-1262.

[7] WUCHTYS, JONESBF, increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science,2007, 316(5827): 1036-1039.

[8] ZENGA, SHENZS, ZHOUJL, et al. The Science of Science: from the perspective of complex systems[J]. Physics Reports-Review Section of Physics Letters,2017(714-715): 1-73.

[9] FORTUNATOS, BERGSTROMCT,B?RNERK, et al. Science of science[J].Science, 2018, 359(6379).

[10] 钱学森. 希望[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理,1981(1): Hope[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T., 1981(1): 7.

[11] WANGD, SONGC, BARABá long-term scientific impact[J].Science, 2013, 342(6154): 127-132.

[12] HSIEHCHEND, ESPINOZAM, teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research[J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1(8): e.

[13] RZHETSKYA, FOSTERJG, FOSTERIT, et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015, 112(47): -.

[14] JIAT, WANGD, patterns of research-interest evolution[J]. Nature Human Behaviour,2017, 1(4): 78.

[15] WAYSF, MORGANAC, CLAUSETA, et al.The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2017, 114(44): 9216-9223.

[16] WUL, WANGD, EVANSJA. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019,566(7744): 378-382.

[17] XIEY, ZHANGC, LAIQ. China's rise as a major contributor to science and technology[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111(26): 9437-9442.

[18] HUANGF. Quality deficit belies the hype[J]. Nature, 2018, 564(7735): 70.

[19] KUHNTS. The essential tension[J].American Journal of Physics, 1979, 47(6):568-569.

[20] AZOULAYP, GRAFFZIVINJS, and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences[J]. The RANDJournal of Economics, 2011, 42(3):527-554.

[21] TIANX, WANGTY. Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(1):211-255.

[22] FOSTERJG, RZHETSKYA, and innovation in scientists'research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015, 80(5): 875-908.

[23] TANGJ, ZHANGJ, YAOL, : extraction and mining of academic social networks[C]//The 14th ACMSIGKDDInternational Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,August 24-27, 2008, Las Vegas, USA.New York: ACMPress, 2018: 990-998.

[24] XIAF, WANGW, BEKELETM, et al. Big scholarly data: a survey[J]. IEEETransactions on Big Data, 2017, 3(1): 18-35.

[25] RZHETSKYA, FOSTERJG, FOSTERIT, et al. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2015, 112(47): -.

[26] COKOLM, IOSSIFOVI, WEINREBC,et al. Emergent behavior of growing knowledge about molecular interactions[J].Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23(10):1243-1247.

[27] KABOFW, COTTON-NESSLERN,HWANGY, et al. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43(9): 1469-1485.

[28] LEAHEYE. From sole investigator to team scientist: trends in the practice and study of research collaboration[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 2016, 42(1): 81-100.

[29] WANGW, YUS, BEKELETM, et collaboration patterns vary with scholars' academic ages[J].Scientometrics, 2017, 112(1): 329-343.

文章来源：《分子科学学报》 网址: http://www.fzkxxbzz.cn/qikandaodu/2020/1019/371.html